User talk:Supervisor 194

From Encyclopedia Of Stupid

Hey there Supe! (I'm sure you just love me calling you that!) Thanks for the Sysop bump! You rule! I can use exclamation points! See? (oops) Seriously...I won't let you down and will prove your faith in me is well placed. Hmmm...just ignore that last sentence...it's too damned serious. Jethro 12:51, 12 December 2007 (PST)

Hey, sorry I haven't been around much lately, I'll be back with it from now on.   DoubleR 10:28, 25 September 2007 (PDT)

Apologies for ballsing up your talk page history, I didn't realise you can't revert to previous versions simply through page history. The irony is that if I'd read the page history before attempting to rollback, I'd have found out how to revert to a previous version and I could've avoided all of that. Bah. Oh, and I will shoot you an email, probably later this evening. DoubleR 03:03, 20 Jun 2007 (PDT)

Hey, correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems as though the current Clever Turn of Phrase of the Week was by Oldbill, not Crabrock. I'm not going to change it just in case I am missing something here, but certainly looking at the history of the Clown article it appears as though Oldbill was the one who came up with the phrase. DoubleR 05:02, 3 Apr 2007 (PDT)

D'oh! I believe that makes me...

-DoubleR 16:14, 17 Dec 2006 (PST)

WAT AM I TO DO --Fbi2thegrave 00:48, 12 Dec 2006 (PST)

THANX That was the nicest thing anyone's ever done for me in my life. I feel truly validated. THIS IS THE HAPPIEST TIME Anyway, who is refereeing the contest this time round? I only ask because I don't mind sitting this one out unless someone's already going to oversee it. I also ask as an excuse to delete the rambling bollocks that used to be here. DoubleR 16:49, 20 Oct 2006 (PDT)

• I think I'm going to have to scrap the contest, nobody is doing anything with it. I need to support the contest with a banner ad, we just don't have enough traffic otherwise. But when we do sort it out, I'll let you be the judge, that's cool. -- Supervisor 194 12:48, 23 Oct 2006 (PDT)
  • Ok thanks, but based on what's been discussed regarding the contest, particularly the amount of money involved, you might want to have the final desicion if the new format takes such a shape. Don't get me wrong I'd be more than happy to judge any contest, it's just that if you're ploughing that much cash into it you're going to want to be satisfied with the outcome. It's entirely your call, I'm happy either way.   - DoubleR 18:17, 26 Oct 2006 (PDT)

These are my favorite emoticons, handily templated for your posting pleasure.                                              

  Yay! I think I'd like to have an SA avatar.

• Username: Jazu
• Image: img.waffleimages.com/img/39bf6cf73fbd2b596f35087ffe03294df57e45ac/eyebrows.gif
• Text: Looking for some URANIUM? CLICK HERE

I don't think there's a rule against impersonating hyperlinks like that... Thanks! --Jazu 05:11, 29 Aug 2006 (PDT)

Yeah I find I have a good memory of IP addresses and who they belong to as well. --Fbi2thegrave 14:43, 17 Jul 2006 (PDT)

• Yeah, but Agentseven is me, so I remember quite clearly who wrote that. Thanks, by the way! :P -- Supervisor 194 14:53, 17 Jul 2006 (PDT)
  • You're welcome. To be honest, my second choice was also you, but it was your "LOL JEWS" addition to the Yams article. I figured that wouldn't be the best first contribution, so I'll save it for some other time. --Fbi2thegrave 15:00, 17 Jul 2006 (PDT)
  • Fake edit: I should explain. When we first started this wiki it was default and anyone could edit, hence the IPs. Back then there really were a grand total of six people who knew this wiki existed (all irc buddies), so even if I wasn't sure that I had written it, the pool of potential authors was pretty shallow. Agentseven was the first nickname I chose. I decided against using that nickname because its my SA one, and looking back, I'm not really sure why. I guess because I was advertising and I didn't want to be too closely tied to it, but whatever. -- Supervisor 194 14:53, 17 Jul 2006 (PDT)

I think in regards to this you may have missed the earlier edit you made. Fbi2thegrave 21:08, 22 Jun 2006 (PDT)

• Crikey, you may be right at that. But he's bacck from the dead and isn't making shit posts, so, oh well. Supervisor 194 08:07, 23 Jun 2006 (PDT)

11 minutes from first vandalization to normality, world record? Fbi2thegrave 21:16, 8 Jun 2006 (PDT)

• You fucking win! Fuck. I need to upgrade this bitch. Someday. Supervisor 194 20:45, 9 Jun 2006 (PDT)

Thanks very much, this really is a tremendous honour! *Sniff*. Aside from the page protect/don't screw around with the front page rules, is there anything else I should be aware of? I mean is it ok to go straight ahead and make sysop changes, so long as there's justification and reasoning to it? Stupid question I know, I just don't want to fuck things up and do something I shouldn't. I've already reverted one edit, I'm just making sure I'm not about to make any mistakes. DoubleR 01:46, 6 Jun 2006 (PST)

I don't know why it doesn't work either :( Anyways, based on your explanation, you got the joke. I was poking fun at template faggotry because it was actually working.

I know the contest is over but how about this

Fbi2thegrave 08:01, 30 May 2006 (PDT)

LOL BUTTSECKS

I am personally honored to have received the Goldstar for my personal best, Yam. Fbi2thegrave 18:41, 12 May 2006 (PDT)

Well, color me flattered. Also, I like the new banner! Fbi2thegrave 13:50, 2 May 2006 (PDT)

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Fbi2thegrave 00:26, 13 Apr 2006 (PDT)

Agentseven and M3 the same person is stupid.

Hey, it's not our fault we write good articles, is it? Fbi2thegrave 11:35, 9 Mar 2006 (PST)

I'm confused... are you Agentseven and M3? Fbi2thegrave 22:48, 8 Mar 2006 (PST)

Hahah, awesome, I love it! Family Guy was easy to write though, since it's pretty much all true.Fbi2thegrave 20:54, 31 Jan 2006 (PST)

We really need to figure out a way to make all these new people read the goddamn rules. Perhaps before registering we can make them scroll through it so they're forced to read it. On another note, I thought the hamster was getting old and didn't know it was our logo, so sorry about that. Fbi2thegrave 00:40, 24 Jan 2006 (PST)

I spent about 15 minutes trying to think of a funnier acronym for AIDS. Then I gave up. Fbi2thegrave 21:20, 17 Jan 2006 (PST)

• I Googled for it. :D Supervisor 194 21:29, 17 Jan 2006 (PST)

For future refrence, are we allowed to give people a Goldstar for an article if they already have one for another article? Just something I was thinking about earlier. Fbi2thegrave 14:55, 6 Jan 2006 (PST)

No problem. Still on winter break here, so I really have nothing better to do. Classes start monday, and professors are already sending out assignments. The bastards. Fbi2thegrave 21:45, 5 Jan 2006 (PST)

Thanks for your quick reply. So, in finding spambot entries, I should check the "Recent Changes" list, check new articles etc. and determine whether they are spambots, and then take the appropriate action?

Oh, I just realised my userpage had a spambot attack, which was reverted. Now I understand the damage spambots do.

--Dardi 19:48, 3 Jan 2006 (PST)

Hey man, what exactly is a spambot? A script that "vandalises" pages by adding crap to them? Please excuse my ignorance.

--Dardi 16:57, 3 Jan 2006 (PST)

For your question about bots:

Reversion

Sysops can revert pages quickly. When looking at a user's contributions, a link that looks like this: [rollback] appears next to edits that are at the top of the edit history. Clicking on the link reverts to the last edit not authored by that user, with the edit summary (Reverted edits by X to last version by Y). This expedites the reversion of edits by anonymous vandals. Note, however, that all users, including those who are not logged in, can revert pages, only less conveniently. (By using the page history to open the version required, edit page, save.)

Sysops can hide vandalism from the Recent Changes page. To do this, add &bot=1 to the end of the url used to access a user's contributions. For example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Michael&bot=1

When the rollback links on the contributions list are clicked, both the revert and the original edit that you are reverting will be hidden from the default Recentchanges display. This mechanism uses the marker originally added to keep massive bot edits from flooding recentchanges, hence the "bot". These changes will be hidden from recent changes unless you click the "bots" link to set hidebots=0. The edits are not hidden from contribs, history, watchlist, etc. The edits remain in the database and are not removed, but they no longer flood Recentchanges. The aim of this feature is to reduce the annoyance factor of a flood vandal with relatively little effort.

This hides it from recent changes, and makes it easier to revert.

Something odd about being reffered to as Mr. G Force, anyways you are correct and I'm terribly sorry for my incomplete toughts, when I made additions I just did it in a stream of concious with spell check on. I shall be more dillgent. (JoeytheGforce)

Contents 1 Hooray! 2 Thanks... 3 OFW 4 A Truly Superior Writer 5 Hey! 6 The Funnyman 7 Wow, you're on fire 8 TEH SWE

Hooray!

I really really like EOS! Please tell me if it is most helpful to create many many stubs to be expanded or to take time occasionally making single complete articles? Smoove K 11:01, 5 Jan 2006 (PST)

Thanks...

For not being too hard on me. I am trying to catch on.

OFW

Oh, okay. Sorry about that. ^_^ Kickaha48 18:03, 2 October 2007 (PDT)

A Truly Superior Writer

My undying thanks goes to you dear Supervisor, because you made my otherwise failing "depression" article (which I wrote while at work frighteningly), a HUGE "fucking funny" success. :) I may add an image or two, to build upon the article. I'll try NOT to be styoopid. What does YOUR friendly, neighborhood banker do while at HER desk? :P

Hey!

I'm glad you liked my contributions, I'll add more stuff in the future. I really liked this wiki.

The Funnyman

This is him spea.. writing.

Why would you block me? I DO want to be here, and I didn't meant to hurt anyone with that article so I don't see the reason behind this banning, If you check my crontibitions you can see that I also created the quote template, the Tampon article and I fixed something in the Goverment article.

Isn't this place about making fun of everything? c'mon you guys write horrible things about people and suddenly If I put a thing or two that might be offensive to us you get all mad and ban my ass out! don't you think that's being a little hypocrit? The worst part is that you call me a troll and revert what I did when I was actually doing good for this place... i recall something from the rules

"Be funny - this encyclopedia is intended to make people laugh and possibly get a little irritated."

If you can't put up with a joke yourselves then how can you spect people to laugh at your articles? Im sorry I created this sock account but I had to tell you this... if you change your mind about the ban please let me know right here, sorry for all the troubles.--Test 10:35, 11 January 2008 (PST)

A very big, warm, wet and pink Thanks to you my firend.--teh Funnyman LOLOLOLOLOL 18:00, 13 January 2008 (PST)

Wow, you're on fire

No problem; thanks for the HMs on my articles.-Ides213

TEH SWE

Could you revise the sweden for spelling and such?