User talk:Stupid
From Encyclopedia Of Stupid
| Hello! Welcome to Food Network®'s Encyclopedia Of Stupid! While we're not completely sure if you suck or not, it appears you are making edits. We know this because every single edit, no matter how minor, is reflected on the Recent changes page, which is heavily patrolled by a gang of trained monkeys.
People who create accounts here generally leave and never come back, so your behavior is baffling to us. Still, we are glad you're on board. For your convenience, here is a link with hints that will endear you to us instead of making us want to kill you and your entire family. Not clicking this link makes the baby Jesus cry. |
Hey, I wouldn't take what Supervisor 194 said to heart too much, I think his comment was a bit extreme tbh. After all, he did say you were off to a 'great start' when you first got here. I think there is a middle ground here. You have written some good stuff, but it's also fair to say that some of your work has been lacking in the humour department (Tony Blair immediately comes to mind). You can certainly improve as a poster and, judging by the amount you've contributed so far, you have the perseverance to make these improvements over time. Don't lose heart (continuing the old love organ theme here - no, not that love organ), and you can have a successful writing career. Just don't give up! DoubleR 14:24, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)
- After discussion with Supervisor 194, I've realised that his point was valid - it iss imperative that we aim as highly as we can. Plans have been made to edit your articles over the next few weeks - what I would suggest is that you look at what is done to your articles then try and mould your style to fit the style of the edits - then you'll most definitely be on the right lines. Stick with us, we'll get there. DoubleR 15:33, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)
- dude! Those articles were placed there to be edited. So feel free to deface them to the bone. At least they can serve as good placeholders or a thing to start with (at least my images can be useful). --Taz 01:32, 24 Jan 2007 (PST)
- That's fair enough. I only got involved because it seemed to me that you had taken what had been said badly, due to your reaction on both your user and talk pages. If that was sarcasm or whatever, then I missed it. I should probably just have kept my mouth shut.
DoubleR 07:53, 24 Jan 2007 (PST)
- That's fair enough. I only got involved because it seemed to me that you had taken what had been said badly, due to your reaction on both your user and talk pages. If that was sarcasm or whatever, then I missed it. I should probably just have kept my mouth shut.
- dude! Those articles were placed there to be edited. So feel free to deface them to the bone. At least they can serve as good placeholders or a thing to start with (at least my images can be useful). --Taz 01:32, 24 Jan 2007 (PST)
